Teams

WNCS Sparks (HRC)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40's Women 6.5 Combo - Mon

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-08vs WNCV Scarola (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Young / Karen Watson vs Debbie Berry / Zsuzsanna Brooks6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristy Owens / Michal Baird vs Arwen Hawes / Patricia van Vonno6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather North / Sheri Sparks vs Michelle Shires / Paula Mabunga7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40's Women 6.5 Combo - Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristy Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Elizabeth McCormick
published 3.5
2.96
Michal Baird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Karen Watson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Gay Anderson
published 3
2.91
Heather North
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Sheri Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
LOUISA HARRISON
published
Eve Homburger
published 3
2.71
Clara Balling
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gay Anderson + Heather North5456% games+7.3% vs expected
LOUISA HARRISON + Michal Baird3255% games+4.8% vs expected
Michal Baird + Gay Anderson3258% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Sparks + Clara Balling213 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Sparks + Michal Baird123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Watson + Elizabeth McCormick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Kristy Owens
16W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Elizabeth McCormick
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Michal Baird
21W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Karen Watson
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Gay Anderson
17W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Heather North
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sheri Sparks
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
LOUISA HARRISON
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Eve Homburger
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Clara Balling
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.