Teams

Ridgetop Krawitz

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-12Won 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Heather Long6-0, 6-0
2023-06-02vs TDC BakerWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Galanti / Mara Wrinkle vs Linda Ramsey / Cris Latief6-1, 6-1
2023-05-31vs TDC SpillareSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Lauren Duke6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Hayes Blackburn vs Rhonda Underwood / Erica Bragg6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-26vs WOCC MoehlingWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Jenny Norfleet6-3, 6-0
2023-05-19vs Westwood Harker / Combs-PokrywkaWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmanda Galanti vs Amy Ringberg6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKirsti Goodwin / Allison Purcell vs Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka / Stephanie Murtaugh6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Christina Bier
published 4
3.80
Amanda Galanti
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.77
Hayes Blackburn
published
Allison Purcell
published 4
3.70
Katy Holder
published
3.47
Mara Wrinkle
published
3.44
Anne Taylor Schaaf
published 3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
published 3.5
3.24
Britta Petersson
published 3.5
3.10
Carin Krawitz
published 3.5
3.09
Jenny Hanna
published
3.03
Pamela Hutzler
published
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Levy
published
Kim Cressy
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsti Goodwin + Amanda Galanti224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Galanti + Christina Bier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Bier
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Amanda Galanti
85W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Hayes Blackburn
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Allison Purcell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Holder
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Mara Wrinkle
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Anne Taylor Schaaf
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Britta Petersson
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carin Krawitz
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jenny Hanna
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Pamela Hutzler
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.