Teams

France/55/6.5/CWD/GACC

2026 NO Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 6.5 NO (55&O) Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-26vs Thibodaux/6.5/55/CWD/AudLost 03
L#1 DoublesJAN COTAYA / Leslie McMichael vs Harriet Landrieu / Donna Dimitri4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesClaudia Theard / Susan Coco vs Aline Williams / Catherine Lim3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonielle Osborn / Nancy Bonifacic vs Pam Vitrano / Bridget Torregrosa2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Leslie McMichael
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Robin Lafont
published
3.25
Jenny Stone
published
3.10
Claudia Theard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Lila Rivas
published
3.09
Susan Coco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Patricia France
published
3.03
Nancy Bonifacic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Tracy Giacone
published
2.87
Lorraine Landry
published
Damona Guillera
published 3
2.75
Laura Russo
published
2.71
Kimberly Gambino
published
2.66
JAN COTAYA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Donielle Osborn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Sandra Huston
published
Laurie Norris
published
Sandra Owens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Stone + Leslie McMichael5259% games+9.3% vs expected
Tracy Giacone + Laurie Norris5167% games+8.7% vs expected
Claudia Theard + Robin Lafont134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie McMichael
64W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Robin Lafont
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Jenny Stone
44W–35L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Claudia Theard
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lila Rivas
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Susan Coco
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Patricia France
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Nancy Bonifacic
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Tracy Giacone
31W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Lorraine Landry
13W–22L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Damona Guillera
10W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Russo
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Kimberly Gambino
17W–13L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
JAN COTAYA
7W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Donielle Osborn
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sandra Huston
3W–8L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Laurie Norris
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Owens
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.