Teams

JDichak (WSRC)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-10vs ABeaver (Jeff Adams)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Matt Higgins4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCaden Greer vs Alec Beaver4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Asaf Ravid1-6, 1-6
2025-07-01vs KMann (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesCaden Greer vs Sean Karasik6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDJ Kulkarni vs Kellan Mann3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs John Roberts1-6, 2-6
2025-06-27vs CBiedrzycki (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Ian Fuster4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Chris Biedrzycki6-7, 2-6
2025-06-26vs MKrasniewski (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Grant Reuter6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Berger vs Mark Krasniewski6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Derek Farmer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-19vs NLeCroy (Weddington)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Dhruv Bhatt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaden Greer vs Nicholas LeCroy3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJohn Berger vs Eric Bostic6-4, 6-2
2025-06-08vs EWeinbrenner (Lifetime)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Eric Weinbrenner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Berger vs Adam Webb7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCaden Greer vs Brandon Pruski7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs GEstrada (Jeff Adams)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Ivan Blakeney6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKevin Stein vs Daniel Gonzalez1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Rafael Balderrama2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caden Greer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.39
Joseph Dichak
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Jaiganesh Rajamanickam
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Alberto Botero
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kevin Stein
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.08
John Berger
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
DJ Kulkarni
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caden Greer
8W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Joseph Dichak
139W–146L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Jaiganesh Rajamanickam
16W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Alberto Botero
20W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Kevin Stein
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.17
John Berger
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
DJ Kulkarni
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.