Teams

Sportime HI --Armada

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 2.5 Day

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-07vs Maximum Tennis Development ZoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Karen Ruzzo vs Nancy Al-omoush / Kayoko Yamamura3-6, 3-6
2025-10-29vs Sportime HI - Hit SquadWon 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Stefanie Schmidt vs Alisha Vazquez / Tammy Pagan2-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Lee / Elizabeth Halen vs Debra Rothschild / Gabrielle Thal-Pruzan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Ruzzo / Valerie Skolnick vs Smita Abraham / Nicole Lee2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesVeronica Barnes / Cathy Lee vs Melissa Klosk / Jilliann Elliott7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLorraine Monchak / Karen Ruzzo vs Natalie Green / Jennifer Hobdy3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Halen / Andrea Johnson vs Danielle Klein / Grace Contopoulos7-6, 6-2
L#1 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Kristen Paolercio vs Noelle DelGiudice / Laura Rubin4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Heery / Cathy Lee vs S Kasim / Marybeth Sheppard6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKally Atkins / Karen Ruzzo vs Joan Indig / Anu Mallapaty6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Andrea Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Cathy Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Veronica Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Celine Dujeux
published 3
2.38
Karen Ruzzo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.30
Kristen Paolercio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Melissa Heery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Elizabeth Halen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.82
Valerie Skolnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Graziano
published
Kally Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Seaworth
published
Lorraine Monchak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stefanie Schmidt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Johnson + Kristen Paolercio5261% games+8.0% vs expected
Lorraine Monchak + Kristen Paolercio1423% games−16.4% vs expected
Melissa Heery + Celine Dujeux3256% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Paolercio + Veronica Barnes5063% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Monchak + Veronica Barnes224 matchesnot enough data
Kally Atkins + Celine Dujeux314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Heery + Kally Atkins123 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Johnson + Kally Atkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrea Johnson
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Cathy Lee
21W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Veronica Barnes
32W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
3
Celine Dujeux
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Karen Ruzzo
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Kristen Paolercio
21W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Melissa Heery
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Elizabeth Halen
20W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Valerie Skolnick
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Jennifer Graziano
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kally Atkins
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katie Seaworth
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorraine Monchak
8W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Stefanie Schmidt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.