Teams

BUTLER

2021 Loudoun Doubles Afternoon Winter Women · Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-18vs MCMANUSWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Rathbone / Jean Garrell vs Suzanne Clegg / April Rabayda6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Tenhaeff / Yesim Temeemi vs Eleanor McManus / Cheryl Kasper6-4, 6-1
2021-03-09vs KOTTER/ O'DONNELLWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Butler / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Susan Ohneiser / Christine Feit7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-03-04vs FRIEDMAN/ MACDONALDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Kyle / Karen Flikeid vs Katie Plofchan / Genevieve Gilinger7-5, 6-1
2021-02-25vs DRAKEWon 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Butler / Janet Rathbone vs Jenny Mitchell / Rebecca Norman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Flikeid / Jea Lee vs Elizabeth Messner / Lisa Linderman6-2, 6-1
2021-02-19vs MCMULLENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Tenhaeff / Yesim Temeemi vs Michelle Grande / Lindsey Frye6-4, 6-3
2021-02-11vs HOFFMANWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeagan Maynard / Janet Rathbone vs Mary Beth Williamson / Cynthia Pointer6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Tenhaeff / Jean Garrell vs Angela Kane / Caroline Hedges6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Michelle Tenhaeff
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.24
Jean Garrell
published
2.96
Janet Rathbone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Kimberly Butler
published
2.64
Karen Flikeid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Kyle
published
Meagan Maynard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Rathbone + Karen Flikeid314 matchesnot enough data
Janet Rathbone + Michelle Tenhaeff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Tenhaeff
306W–196L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Jean Garrell
23W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Janet Rathbone
159W–145L career · 3 lines in 2021
63%37%<1%
2.96
Kimberly Butler
19W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Karen Flikeid
115W–100L career · 2 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
Julie Kyle
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Meagan Maynard
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.