Teams

Yadkin Kraska/Bettinger 18s 7.5

2024 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 7.5 - Wednesday Mornings

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-09vs Yadkin/FCC/18+7.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Julie Dover vs Lily Fulks / Kelly Rike4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-05vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+7.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Mohorn / Shawn McFarlin vs Katie Thompson / Margot Beach3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-09-25vs Yadkin/FCC/18+7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Laura Vary vs Jamie Forsey / Mary Lancaster6-2, 6-2
2024-09-04vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Krisla Berreth vs Bridget Gislimberti / Callie Bartock1-6, 3-6
2024-08-14vs Yadkin/Thompson/OT/18+7.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Krisla Berreth vs Brandi Jacques / Jennifer Mays2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 - Wednesday Mornings have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.74
Stephanie Bettinger
published
3.73
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.69
Julie Dover
published
3.66
Angela McGinn
published 4
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
published 3.5
3.46
Elisabeth Kraska
published 3.5
3.33
Christina Mohorn
published 3.5
3.30
Laura Vary
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.17
Aprille Black
published 3.5
2.94
Melanie Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Kraska + Stephanie Bettinger4356% games+2.8% vs expected
Catherine Tanner + Stephanie Bettinger4351% games−0.4% vs expected
Shawn McFarlin + Catherine Tanner3547% games−4.6% vs expected
Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Nundkumar
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
Stephanie Bettinger
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Julie Dover
41W–22L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Angela McGinn
14W–17L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Elisabeth Kraska
44W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Christina Mohorn
35W–41L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.33
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.30
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.