Teams

WTC- Crowley 18 & Over 3.0 Women

2026 Dothan USTA Adult 18 & Over Fall League · 3.0 Women Friday Morning

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-14vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 3.0 WomenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJenny Nelson / Elizabeth Saliba vs Margaret Poston / Payton Ball4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMillie Watson vs Karelia Castillo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Amanda Roberson vs Mandy Pesamoska / Jamie Peacock4-6, 4-6
2025-11-12vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 3.0 WomenWon 21
L#1 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Elizabeth Saliba vs Carol Hundley / Julie Knight3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMillie Watson vs Allison Edwards6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine Martin / Shea Turner vs Karelia Castillo / Jamie Peacock4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-24vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 3.0 WomenLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Roberson / Millie Watson vs Allison Edwards / Carol Hundley5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBernadette Haskins vs Margaret Poston0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Alford / Elizabeth Saliba vs Mandy Pesamoska / Evee Ventress6-3, 6-2
2025-10-17vs WTC - Poston 18 & Over 3.0 WomenLost 13
L#1 DoublesJenny Nelson / Katherine Martin vs Julie Knight / Karelia Castillo3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMillie Watson vs Allison Edwards3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Elizabeth Saliba vs Payton Ball / Carol Hundley1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Elliott / Amanda Roberson vs Jamie Peacock / Mandy Pesamoska2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women Friday Morning
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC - Poston 18 & Over 3.0 Women40124996
2WTC- Crowley 18 & Over 3.0 Women0441226176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Carie Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Millie Watson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.89
Caroline Alford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Elizabeth Saliba
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Jenny Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Shea Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Bernadette Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Renee Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carie Crowley
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Millie Watson
10W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Caroline Alford
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Elizabeth Saliba
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
Shea Turner
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Bernadette Haskins
3W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Renee Elliott
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.