Teams

The Bad News Bears

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Alicia Senior
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.87
Mariola Idrobo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Claudia Viso
published 4
3.73
Silvia Amat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
3.70
Paola Jaime
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Tracey Kealy
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Morayma Remigio
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.60
Sandra Batalla
published
3.58
Damarys Vega
published 4
3.51
Mary Jane Raine
published
3.50
Janna Dadesky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Eunice McCann
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
3.25
Sara Cleveland
published
3.10
Deanna Rasco
published 3.5
Renate Krause
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Silvia Amat + Paola Jaime181652% games+6.7% vs expected
Silvia Amat + Morayma Remigio6451% games+6.7% vs expected
Tracey Kealy + Alicia Senior6257% games+1.2% vs expected
Tracey Kealy + Morayma Remigio3939% games−4.5% vs expected
Morayma Remigio + Paola Jaime2844% gamesnot enough data
Eunice McCann + Renate Krause1544% gamesnot enough data
Morayma Remigio + Renate Krause4252% gamesnot enough data
Silvia Amat + Renate Krause5061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alicia Senior
65W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Mariola Idrobo
105W–81L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Claudia Viso
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Silvia Amat
63W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Carolyn Seckinger
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Paola Jaime
96W–134L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Tracey Kealy
71W–77L career · 8 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Morayma Remigio
84W–155L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Sandra Batalla
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Damarys Vega
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
Mary Jane Raine
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Janna Dadesky
69W–91L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Eunice McCann
178W–120L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Sara Cleveland
20W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Deanna Rasco
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Renate Krause
49W–39L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.