← Teams

N OR-MV-Ramshaw

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jason Meunier
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Brian Hetland
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeremy Harkin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.22
Robert Piercy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Justin Foster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.92
Matt Ramshaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
David Vail
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesJason Meunier / Brian Hetland vs Monte Gonzales / Mark Beilstein6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRobert Piercy vs Lawrence Cooper7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJustin Foster / Jeremy Harkin vs Blake Simonsen / Michael Rich7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Vail / Christopher Jones vs Scott Quinn / Jaime Aranda-Michel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-15Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJason Meunier / Brian Hetland vs Jason Floyd / Scott Dickinson7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJustin Foster / David Vail vs Will Bayon / Ian Schnadig6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErik Guttormsen / Robert Piercy vs Sven Louis / Matt Vuylsteke6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJeremy Harkin / Robert Piercy vs John Bohls / Kevin Grant6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDavid Vail vs Dan Blaker6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMatt Ramshaw / Christopher Jones vs Xiaolin Nan / Qiming Wang6-2, 6-1
2024-06-01Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesJason Meunier vs David Williams6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Jones / Justin Foster vs Michael Rich / Scott Tse2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErik Guttormsen / Robert Piercy vs Manoj Agnihotri / Mark Beilstein7-6, 6-3
2024-05-19Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesJustin Foster / Jian Chen vs Trevor Hammond / Nathan Bernhardt7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRobert Piercy vs Marshall Levine6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMatt Ramshaw / Jeremy Harkin vs Peter Schulman / Nathan Ayotte6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Vail / Christopher Jones vs Jared Shipley / Keith Ketterling6-1, 6-4
2024-05-04Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesBrian Hetland / Jason Meunier vs Eric Heredia / Maarten Schreuder6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Vail vs Stephen Blum6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Piercy / David Hubka vs Matthew Thoreson / Grey Proctor6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristopher Jones / Justin Foster vs Gaurav Rai / Robert Vukanovich6-2, 6-0
2024-04-27Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBrian Hetland / David Vail vs Yongseok Cheon / Seungho Ham6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeremy Harkin / David Hubka vs Jinhong Shin / Jungjoo Lee6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMatt Ramshaw / Erik Guttormsen vs Kilhyun Bang / Byoungsoo Ham6-4, 6-1
2024-04-21Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesJason Meunier / David Vail vs Jinhong Shin / Yongseok Cheon6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJustin Foster vs Hyoungsuk Chang6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Hetland / David Hubka vs Kyeong Park / Jose Hwang6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatt Ramshaw / Christopher Jones vs Seungho Ham / Donghyup Ryu7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jason Meunier
14W–3L career
1%89%10%
3.37
3.5
Brian Hetland
12W–10L career
1%95%5%
3.34
3
Jeremy Harkin
46W–45L career
0%19%81%
3.22
3.5
Robert Piercy
88W–79L career
1%99%0%
3.22
3
Justin Foster
26W–23L career
0%86%14%
2.95
3
Matt Ramshaw
23W–29L career
0%93%7%
2.92
3
David Vail
41W–34L career
0%96%4%
2.88

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.