Teams

Ev.Fultz40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-11vs Jo.Hoomani40CWon 20
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Kevin Nguyen vs Mitchell Wolborsky / Bradley Eisenberg7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEvan Fultz / Jeffrey Pollack vs Jeff Abercrombie / John Hoomani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-10vs Ma.Wood40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Wasko / Garrett Lovejoy vs Jason Prabel / Alessandro Montanari6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Zhe Lyu vs Brian Lape / Brent Lamm5-7, 4-6
2024-09-12vs Ga.Fye40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Brian Ross vs Matthew Durbin / Britton Williams1-6, 2-6
2024-09-05vs Ph.Gugliotta40CLost 02
L#2 DoublesLance Williams / Garrett Lovejoy vs Chun Lav / Eric Moritz3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesZhe Lyu / Brent Townsend vs Ivan Tseng / James Coblentz5-7, 4-6
2024-09-03vs Br.McLean40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Wasko / Garrett Lovejoy vs John Cleary / Michael Tadych6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Jeffrey Pollack vs Bill Green / Jason Grieco6-4, 6-2
2024-08-22vs Ed.King40CWon 10
W#3 DoublesVincent Conzola / Zhe Lyu vs Charles Ashby / Ed Stempien6-2, 6-4
2024-08-15vs Ro.Elliott40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLance Williams / Jeffrey Pollack vs Tucker King / David Coman4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvan Fultz / Charles Clift vs David Hill / Ronald Elliott3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
3.49
Brent Townsend
published 3.5
3.48
Chris Wasko
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Pollack
published
3.23
Lance Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Evan Fultz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Patrick Graney
published
3.06
Brian Ross
published 3
3.04
Charles Clift
published 3
2.90
Garrett Lovejoy
published 3
2.59
Zhe Lyu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Whitehorne
39W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
3.5
Brent Townsend
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Chris Wasko
91W–84L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.32
Lance Williams
81W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Patrick Graney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Brian Ross
32W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Charles Clift
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Garrett Lovejoy
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Zhe Lyu
16W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.