Teams

Fleming 18+3.0

2026 Harford Adult 18 & Over · Harford Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-09vs Melcher 18+3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesKaren Emmett / Amy Clough vs Stefanie Melcher / Amy Allman6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmanda Schindhelm vs Kate Calligy1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKathie Nichols / Janet Handy vs Lee Ann Edwards / Caitlin Donis6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulieann Connelly / Julie Marindin vs Sarah Gaston / Amber Milwee6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-27vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Emmett / Cathy Spires vs Nadiya Shellman / Heather Golden6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Kreller vs Laura Chabalowski0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Schindhelm / Julie Marindin vs Faith Roussey / Christine Cloonan0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Tag / Catherine Thomas vs Kate Calligy / Amber Milwee3-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKathie Nichols / Cathy Spires vs Stefanie Melcher / Amy Allman1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Schindhelm vs Lacey Sliger0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Melchionni / Amy Clough vs Heather Golden / Christine Cloonan0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Marindin / Catherine Thomas vs Sarah Gaston / Amber Milwee6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-13vs Melcher 18+3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesKathie Nichols / Cathy Spires vs Stefanie Melcher / Christine Cloonan6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmanda Schindhelm vs Laura Chabalowski0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJill Melchionni / Janet Handy vs Lacey Sliger / Lee Ann Edwards7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulieann Connelly / Bonnie Thomas vs Sarah Gaston / Kate Calligy2-6, 4-6
2026-05-09vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKathie Nichols / Cathy Spires vs Amy Allman / Nadiya Shellman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandy Kreller vs Lee Ann Edwards0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulieann Connelly / Amy Clough vs Heather Golden / Christine Cloonan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Schindhelm / Catherine Thomas vs Faith Roussey / Caitlin Donis3-6, 2-6
2026-05-06vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesBonnie Thomas / Janet Handy vs Heather Golden / Nadiya Shellman2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAmanda Schindhelm vs Sarah Gaston2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathie Nichols / Cathy Spires vs Christine Cloonan / Laura Chabalowski6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Marindin / Tanya Tag vs Faith Roussey / Lacey Sliger2-6, 3-6
2026-05-02vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Clough / Cathy Spires vs Stefanie Melcher / Amy Allman6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulieann Connelly vs Sarah Gaston2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSandy Kreller / Julie Marindin vs Lizabel Acosta / Lee Ann Edwards2-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesJill Melchionni / Janet Handy vs Amy Allman / Caitlin Donis5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Kreller vs Lacey Sliger1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathie Nichols / Julieann Connelly vs Lizabel Acosta / Nadiya Shellman6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Schindhelm / Kathleen Thompson vs Faith Roussey / Laura Chabalowski1-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs Melcher 18+3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCathy Spires / Julieann Connelly vs Stefanie Melcher / Christine Cloonan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulie Marindin vs Lee Ann Edwards4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Clough / Kathie Nichols vs Heather Golden / Lacey Sliger7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathleen Thompson / Tanya Tag vs Sarah Gaston / Amber Milwee4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Harford Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Melcher 18+3.00929719223
2Fleming 18+3.00972960399

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Janet Handy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.84
Kathie Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.78
Julieann Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Bonnie Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jill Melchionni
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Cathy Spires
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.67
Amy Clough
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Julie Marindin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.45
Tanya Tag
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Amanda Schindhelm
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.32
Sandy Kreller
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Emmett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Nichols + Cathy Spires8553% games+9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Handy
3W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Kathie Nichols
28W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Julieann Connelly
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Bonnie Thomas
1W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Jill Melchionni
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cathy Spires
20W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Amy Clough
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Julie Marindin
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Tanya Tag
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.45
3
Amanda Schindhelm
0W–7L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.36
Sandy Kreller
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
Karen Emmett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Thompson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.