Teams

DNunn/NBragg (Foxcroft Hills)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-19vs MFarley (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarcus Wege / Daniel Nunn vs Mark Brandon / Steven Eagan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Marcus Wege vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesZach Henderson / Patrick Nitsche vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-03vs PGibson (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Marcus Wege vs Jihun Moon / Jarrett Meadors6-1, 6-3
2025-03-27vs DPazo/CSwaminathan (BRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatrick Nitsche / Christopher Curtin vs Agustin Velasquez / Mark Utyesonich4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMarcus Wege / Jared McKiernan vs Benjamin Pennell / Diego Pazo7-5, 6-3
2025-03-21vs MWaleski (Hornets Nest)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarcus Wege / Jared McKiernan vs Joel Turner / Frank Martin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-13vs JClarke/Dukes (Matthews)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Jared McKiernan vs Omar Punjabi / Raj Voleti2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcus Wege / Matthew Kline vs Darnaye Black / Michael de Amicis4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-06vs BSmith (Windyrush)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesMarcus Wege vs David Gora0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Nunn / Jared McKiernan vs Chris Bauer / Grant Alexander6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jared McKiernan
published
4.23
Bret Sprague
published 4.5
4.21
Marcus Wege
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.14
Patrick Nitsche
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
4.08
Anthony Duda
published 4.5
3.97
Carl Yerger
published 4.5
3.84
Daniel Nunn
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Nitsche + Daniel Nunn4168% gamesnot enough data
Marcus Wege + Daniel Nunn314 matchesnot enough data
Patrick Nitsche + Jared McKiernan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared McKiernan
3W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Bret Sprague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Marcus Wege
88W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Patrick Nitsche
125W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
4.5
Anthony Duda
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
4.08
4.5
Carl Yerger
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Daniel Nunn
102W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.