Teams

SFV - Calabasas Aces

2023 SoCal Doubles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.69 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-19vs SFV - Team CorbinLost 01
L#3 DoublesSonia Bekian / Lisa Iezza vs Elisabeth Oei / Kathy Corbin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-04vs SFV - The Coffin CornersLost 01
L#3 DoublesSonia Bekian / Lisa Iezza vs Karen Gouveia / Debbie Zolla4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-08vs SFV - Bourne To Be WildWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Iezza / Sonia Bekian vs Lara Fermanis / Syd Banach6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Michelle Nardiello
published
3.80
Aimee Butcher
published 4
3.68
Suzie Yamamoto
published
3.55
Mary Manix
published
3.55
Corrine Weiner
published 4
3.55
Aimee Alejandre
published 3.5
3.55
Erin MacKie
published
3.49
Lisa Iezza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Patti Wilson
published
3.40
Sophia McCreary
published
3.37
Pauline McLean
published 3.5
3.29
Arianne Rudes
published 3.5
3.28
Cindy Giammarrusco
published 3.5
3.23
Amanda Saxe
published 3.5
2.83
Rosie Casillas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline McLean + Aimee Alejandre7061% games+13.0% vs expected
Corrine Weiner + Pauline McLean4645% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Giammarrusco + Pauline McLean2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Nardiello
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Aimee Butcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.80
Suzie Yamamoto
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Corrine Weiner
88W–108L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Aimee Alejandre
81W–75L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Erin MacKie
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Lisa Iezza
149W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Patti Wilson
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Pauline McLean
37W–71L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Arianne Rudes
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cindy Giammarrusco
44W–69L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Amanda Saxe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
Rosie Casillas
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.