Teams

YTC-Stephen

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-23vs SC-Nadal That BadSplit 22
W#1 DoublesScott Stephen / Dan Ferguson vs Jerry Henderson / Kreg Shelby6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Asriel vs Carl Warring0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Raymond Rust Jr vs John Bumgarner / Bill Schoultz7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJim Miller / Robert Wing vs Clinton Marvel / Kevin Collins1-6, 4-6
2021-05-22vs SC-WillmanWon 31
W#1 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / John Fernandez vs Sean Lumsden / Michael Moloney6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesScott Stephen vs Mario Piergallini7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJim Miller / John Asriel vs Jeffrey Gillespie / Clark Richards1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDan Ferguson / Ryan Davis vs Steve Lamberson / Andrew Anderson2-6, 3-6
2021-05-22vs PC-KohanLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Stephen / John Fernandez vs Emerson Clark / David Jones2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDan Ferguson / Raymond Rust Jr vs Wayne Kohan / Michael Way2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJim Miller / John Asriel vs Ivan Guevara / Jeremey White2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-21vs NP-North Park - WoodardLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Stephen / Dan Ferguson vs Mark Gardner / Shawn Woodard4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRaymond Rust Jr / Jim Miller vs Joseph Lenti / Bryan Osborn4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Asriel / Ryan Davis vs Doug Bost / Steve Kuka2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Raymond Rust Jr
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Dan Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Scott Stephen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Ryan Davis
published
John Asriel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Wing
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Asriel + Raymond Rust Jr7159% games+12.9% vs expected
John Asriel + Robert Wing5258% gamesnot enough data
John Fernandez + Dan Ferguson4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Raymond Rust Jr
56W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Dan Ferguson
19W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Scott Stephen
59W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Ryan Davis
22W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
John Asriel
25W–25L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Fernandez
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Wing
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.