Teams

CAC-Birkhofer/Kralj

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Penny Birkhofer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Katherine Kralj
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.63
Donna Roisom
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.03
Jana Hirst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results6 ties
2022-05-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Katherine Kralj vs Nancy Decherd / Marie Picard7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Mary Ann Seeger vs Mary Sides / Sara Salvi6-1, 6-3
2022-04-29Won 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Goodfriend / Katherine Kralj vs Kathryn Smith / Linn Wofford6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Lee Havens vs Kathleen Budnick / Marcia Baisch6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Jana Hirst vs Sara Salvi / Nancy Osborne7-5, 6-1
2022-04-14Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Goodfriend / Katherine Kralj vs Kathryn Smith / Marie Picard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Roisom / Mary Ann Seeger vs Janet de Morgan / Marcia Baisch6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Linda Christeson vs Linn Wofford / Mary Rousseau6-1, 6-1
2022-04-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Roisom / Mary Ann Seeger vs Marcia Baisch / Janet de Morgan6-3, 6-3
2022-04-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesRise Hawley / Katherine Kralj vs Lynne Annett / Marie Picard6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Karen Oyler vs Kathleen Budnick / Kathryn Smith6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJana Hirst / Donna Roisom vs Sally Lovett / Sara Salvi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-31Split 11
L#1 DoublesPenny Birkhofer / Rise Hawley vs Lynne Annett / Nancy Decherd6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatherine Kralj / Karen Oyler vs Kathryn Smith / Kathleen Budnick6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Penny Birkhofer
68W–50L career
not enough data
4
Katherine Kralj
142W–116L career
6%94%0%
3.63
4
Donna Roisom
100W–85L career
9%91%0%
3.63
3
Jana Hirst
33W–66L career
0%66%34%
3.03

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.