Teams

Ray 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-30vs Dixon 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMelinda Tucker vs LoriAnn Owen3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Lauren Tankersley2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMelinda Tucker vs Chelsea Ward6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMary Mullens vs Jennie Goforth5-7, 4-6
2026-07-16vs Barnes 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Lyndsey Grubb6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCarrie Hanger vs Karin Rochester1-6, 0-6
2026-07-13vs Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesPamela Banister vs Kathleen Mooney1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMary Mullens vs Tara Rusiewicz0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCarrie Hanger vs Liz Busch0-6, 3-6
2026-06-29vs Johnson 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesPamela Banister vs DEBORAH WELLS4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMelinda Tucker vs Shatana Knight1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMary Mullens vs Jennie Goforth1-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Dixon 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesPamela Banister vs Karen Hardesty2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Kim Burgess0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesMary Mullens vs Lauren Tankersley2-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 01
L#2 SinglesMelinda Tucker vs Kathleen Mooney1-6, 0-6
2026-06-01vs Barnes 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Meredith Lantz1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCarrie Hanger vs Karin Rochester2-6, 1-6
2026-05-19vs Johnson 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPamela Banister vs Ginger Ballard0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMelinda Tucker vs Diane Puckett6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women Singles Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Johnson 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM912739133
2Dixon 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM9121921207
3Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM64201022181
4Summerlee/GRETA 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM37102041277
5Barnes 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM2862449313
6Ray 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM1962449319

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Melinda Tucker
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.65
Mary Mullens
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.39
Pamela Banister
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.00
Carrie Hanger
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Tucker + Mary Mullens5348% games−11.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melinda Tucker
18W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Mary Mullens
16W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Pamela Banister
1W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.39
3
Allyson Wood
15W–25L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Carrie Hanger
3W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.