Teams

Markham 7.5 Combo

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-12vs BMooneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Holscher / Joe Neylan vs Howard Critcher / Blake Paro6-0, 6-3
2022-10-05vs DSwannWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Paul Holscher vs Greg Kasse / Vincent Conzola6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMike Hennen / John Vander Vennet vs Ken Nowell / Kevin Breemes7-6, 7-6
2022-09-28vs IJJones ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Morgan Camp vs Philippe Adams / Wes Snead6-2, 6-3
2022-09-21vs JGouveia 7.5 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesMorgan Camp / Robert Brown vs Dylan DeMacy / David McNeill6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoe Neylan / John Vander Vennet vs Mark Zimmerman / Frank Allison1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-14vs SLav 7.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesPenn Holderness / Joe Neylan vs Mark Uttridge / Emanuele Michi6-4, 6-1
2022-08-31vs DSwannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Ted Sherburne vs Travis Payne / Ajaz Sadiq6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPenn Holderness / John Vander Vennet vs Ken Nowell / Kevin Breemes3-6, 4-6
2022-08-24vs IJJones ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoe Neylan / Morgan Camp vs Frank Moser / Andrew Austin7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTed Sherburne / Robert Brown vs John Wagner / Wes Snead2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMike Hennen / John Vander Vennet vs Tyler Salisbury / Rhett Hartley3-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs JGouveia 7.5 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesTed Sherburne / Lloyd Brown vs Larry Essary / Tom Harman6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Joe Neylan
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.84
Morgan Camp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.77
Ted Sherburne
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Bryan Barker
published 4
3.69
Mike Hennen
published
3.66
Penn Holderness
published
3.60
Lloyd Brown
published
3.48
John Markham
published
3.43
John Vander Vennet
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
William Amburn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgan Camp + Ted Sherburne12854% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Neylan
107W–46L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Morgan Camp
117W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Ted Sherburne
148W–78L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bryan Barker
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Mike Hennen
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Penn Holderness
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lloyd Brown
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.60
John Markham
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
John Vander Vennet
81W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
William Amburn
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.