Teams

Sh.Elder65A

2026 Capital Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-22vs Su.Turnburke65ALost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Hall / Kathy Bostrom vs Leslie Corn / Susan Hembarsky2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Burnette / Mari Jameel vs CARLA FIELDS / Luann Richardson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Marchi / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Bonnie Giles / Linda Carroll1-6, 1-6
2026-04-15vs El.Osbourne65ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Mari Jameel vs Millie Rushton / Andrea Pfeiffer6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLori Hall / Diane Burnette vs Theresa Rosario-Jansen / India Pleasants4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-08vs Ka.Serow65A3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Kelly / Lori Hall vs Kristin Hall / Kathleen Tsibulsky6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Diane Burnette vs Kathy Casadonte / Alice Snell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Cheryl Sweitzer / Frederica Shipman2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-01vs Su.Turnburke65ALost 12
L#1 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Mary Kelly vs Sherry Ingle / Diane Abourisk4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Diane Burnette vs Joyce Lake / Margo Grant7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMari Jameel / Patricia Smith vs CARLA FIELDS / Luann Richardson0-6, 2-6
2026-03-27vs Ka.Serow65A3.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMari Jameel / Lori Hall vs Kathleen Tsibulsky / Donna Holtaway2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Patricia Smith vs Alice Snell / Kathy Casadonte4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Beverly Marchi vs Kim Hopkins / Debra Allen6-2, 6-1
2026-03-25vs El.Osbourne65AWon 21
W#1 DoublesNoelle Schofield / Sherry Elder vs Suzanne Brown / Linda Heidgerd4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMari Jameel / Peggy Maslow vs Beverly Rubin / Mitzi Ellis3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Kelly / Beverly Marchi vs India Pleasants / Wanda Wilson7-5, 6-1
2026-03-11vs Su.Turnburke65ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Burnette / Peggy Maslow vs Sherry Ingle / Michell Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Elder / Patricia Smith vs Joyce Lake / Karen Wakeford2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMari Jameel / Kathy Bostrom vs Linda Carroll / CARLA FIELDS1-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs El.Osbourne65ALost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Hall / Noelle Schofield vs Suzanne Brown / Sharon Foster2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Bostrom / Mary Kelly vs Linda Heidgerd / Deborah Brazee5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPeggy Maslow / DEBRA LAUGHERY vs Wanda Wilson / Beverly Rubin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-25vs Ka.Serow65A3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Smith / Noelle Schofield vs Kathy Casadonte / Alice Snell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Marchi / Mary Kelly vs Kathleen Tsibulsky / Frederica Shipman5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Su.Turnburke65A9022516186
2El.Osbourne65A54131433245
3Ka.Serow65A3.536111635258
4Sh.Elder65A1881943287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Beverly Marchi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Noelle Schofield
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.06
Lori Hall
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.93
Kathy Bostrom
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.80
Mari Jameel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Diane Burnette
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Peggy Maslow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Sherry Elder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
DEBRA LAUGHERY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DEBRA LAUGHERY + Peggy Maslow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beverly Marchi
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Noelle Schofield
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lori Hall
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Kathy Bostrom
57W–83L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Mari Jameel
38W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Diane Burnette
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Peggy Maslow
30W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Sherry Elder
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
DEBRA LAUGHERY
48W–91L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.