Teams

Lovin' It

2026 Adult 55 and Over League · 8.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.55 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-10vs BoomersLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeslie Wilshusen / Mindy Armour vs Tracy Halbersleben / Elizabeth Stanley-Hunt0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGaela Prince / Elina Hartkopf vs Jeanne Dunn / Josephine Moyes1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesM Beverly Rivers / Alice Koniges vs Liezl Lao / Pamela Dolin0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-03vs MCC Team SpiritLost 03
L#1 DoublesElina Hartkopf / Bonnie Gray vs Sarah Schmidt / Tesha Newman1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Wilshusen / shar martin vs Cynthia Funai / Kelly Cannon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Grandon / Andrea Karal vs Caroline Gammie / Karla Nutt2-6, 3-6
2026-04-26vs Wahine Slama JamaLost 03
L#1 Doublesshar martin / Kelly Thayer vs Rachel Christopher / Lore Lee Robello1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBarbara Botkin / Bonnie Gray vs Luanne Apo / Maylynn Ikioka0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRita Ingstad / M Beverly Rivers vs Abbie Murray / Jody Singsank2-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs BoomersLost 12
L#1 Doublesshar martin / Gaela Prince vs Pamela Dolin / Jeanne Dunn0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlice Koniges / Kelly Thayer vs Josephine Moyes / Kristine Oyama2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTamara Farwig / Rita Ingstad vs Anne Burch / Leslie Haughney7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Wahine Slama JamaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Grandon / Andrea Karal vs Lore Lee Robello / Tricia Wilstead0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Botkin / Elina Hartkopf vs Susan Armstrong / Rachel Christopher1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGaela Prince / M Beverly Rivers vs Rowena Nikki Baysa / Irene Ydens0-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs MCC Team SpiritLost 12
L#1 DoublesBonnie Gray / Barbara Botkin vs Karla Nutt / Deb Rinaldi2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Thayer / Andrea Karal vs Sarah Schmidt / Tesha Newman1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTamara Farwig / Rita Ingstad vs Jennifer Goldyn / Kelly Cannon1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wahine Slama Jama4213512125
2MCC Team Spirit4210818151
3Lovin' It0621634213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Rita Ingstad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Andrea Karal
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Kelly Thayer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
shar martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
M Beverly Rivers
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Tamara Farwig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Elina Hartkopf
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Leslie Wilshusen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Barbara Botkin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Gaela Prince
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Bonnie Gray
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Mindy Armour
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Barbara Grandon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Alice Koniges
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Thayer + M Beverly Rivers5260% games+6.5% vs expected
Barbara Botkin + Kelly Thayer5555% games+3.8% vs expected
Kelly Thayer + shar martin2443% games−0.6% vs expected
Leslie Wilshusen + M Beverly Rivers101048% games−1.3% vs expected
Barbara Botkin + Bonnie Gray61542% games−2.2% vs expected
Barbara Grandon + Gaela Prince41045% games−3.1% vs expected
Barbara Botkin + Mindy Armour3540% games−11.5% vs expected
Barbara Botkin + M Beverly Rivers2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rita Ingstad
63W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Andrea Karal
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kelly Thayer
61W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
shar martin
36W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
M Beverly Rivers
112W–81L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Tamara Farwig
73W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Elina Hartkopf
7W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Leslie Wilshusen
46W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Botkin
45W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Gaela Prince
49W–79L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bonnie Gray
8W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Mindy Armour
17W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Grandon
64W–98L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Alice Koniges
14W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.