Teams

Jo.Henry18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-25vs Lu.Gillenwater18ALost 14
W#1 DoublesCushing Donelan / Whit Newton vs John Glowiak / Yee Nguyen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDoug Myers vs Patrick Johnstone1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Wooldridge / David Kleisch vs Jonathan Olson / Brendan OConnor2-6, 4-5
L#2 SinglesParker Jones vs Emory Miller4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChris Chapman / Danny Lumsden vs Dewayne Southern / Keith Spainhour1-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs Ra.Raj18AWon 41
W#1 DoublesCushing Donelan / Bradley Wooldridge vs Charles Clift / Hogan Ellis0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Barry Gitarts6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesParker Jones / Cameron Proctor vs Jeff Jugan / Joey Post3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesWhit Newton vs Rajiv Raj6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChris Chapman / Danny Lumsden vs Jared Dix / Chris Wetzel6-3, 6-4
2026-04-04vs Ja.Grieco18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesParker Jones / Timothy Franklin vs Jason Grieco / Matt Vaughn6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesThomas Younger / Bradley Wooldridge vs Mark Gentry / Mike Hampton6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJon Henry vs Cameron Kirby3-6, 3-6
2026-03-28vs Ro.Harris18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesCushing Donelan / Doug Myers vs Marco Contino / Robert Harris6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTimothy Franklin / Bradley Wooldridge vs Brian Buckingham / David Dykes6-1, 6-0
2026-03-14vs Br.Kelly18ALost 23
L#1 DoublesKyle Felmet / Bradley Wooldridge vs Joe Warenda / Paul Baggett1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Chad Parker6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWhit Newton / Cushing Donelan vs Brinson Taylor / Brad Kelly6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDanny Lumsden vs Sujay Koneru2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Younger / Jon Henry vs Sam Slater / Brandon Gadke2-6, 6-7
2026-03-07vs Jo.Williamson18ALost 04
L#1 DoublesDoug Myers / Cameron Proctor vs Joseph Williamson / Nishant Nayudu1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Kleisch vs James Stiegler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Chapman / Danny Lumsden vs Chad Cox / Kenneth Lesher4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesThomas Younger vs Alessandro Montanari3-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs Lu.Gillenwater18ALost 13
L#1 DoublesKyle Felmet / Doug Myers vs Luke Gillenwater / Yee Nguyen4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Dave Hunt3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanny Lumsden / Thomas Younger vs John Glowiak / Nishant Mohan0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesParker Jones vs Patrick Johnstone3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ra.Yasin18A3.08035515213
2Lu.Gillenwater18A7029614177
3Sp.Anderson18A71291128289
4Jo.Williamson18A52231230280
5Br.Kelly18A52211431261
6Jo.Hoomani18A53211941347
7Ma.Morriston18A3.043161942326
8Ro.Harris18A33131736277
9Jo.Henry18A24111942290
10Br.Pickett18A26142655394
11Mi.Campbell18A17112963423
12Ra.Raj18A1793164435
13Ja.Grieco18A0571839265
14Jo.Moore18A0772858364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Parker Jones
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Timothy Franklin
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Whit Newton
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Cushing Donelan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
John Neese
published
Cameron Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Bradley Wooldridge
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Doug Myers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.64
Kyle Felmet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Thomas Younger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Jon Henry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.45
David Kleisch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.43
Chester Allen
published 3
2.40
Danny Lumsden
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parker Jones
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Timothy Franklin
23W–3L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Whit Newton
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.06
3
Cushing Donelan
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
John Neese
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Cameron Proctor
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Bradley Wooldridge
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Doug Myers
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Kyle Felmet
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Thomas Younger
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jon Henry
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
David Kleisch
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
3
Chester Allen
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43
3
Danny Lumsden
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.