Teams

SS-H YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-15vs NJ BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Beverly Tellis vs Mari Tamura / Yoshiko Yamashita6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Janet McNutt vs Barbara Everard / Crystal Campbell Messer6-2, 6-0
2023-06-08vs GAC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Janet McNutt vs Katie Deline / Julie Wilson7-5, 6-1
2023-06-01vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet McNutt / Nancy Shipp vs Julie Clapham / Aimee Hamilton6-4, 6-1
2023-05-18vs LTFC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Beverly Tellis vs Lori Benson / Melissa Griese6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Janet McNutt vs Carol Jochens / Rebecca Pulick6-2, 6-2
2023-05-10vs CK BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Beverly Tellis vs Cyndy Besselievre / Karen Greenwood6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Ginger Phillips
published
4.43
Kara Gerczynski
published
4.29
Susan Hoelscher
published
4.16
Kathy Anselmo
published
4.08
Beverly Tellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Janet McNutt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.56
Martha Williams
published
3.54
Anne Means
published 3.5
Kristin Warren
published
Nancy Shipp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kara Gerczynski + Beverly Tellis404 matchesnot enough data
Ginger Phillips + Janet McNutt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Phillips
26W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
4.54
Kara Gerczynski
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
Susan Hoelscher
24W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
Kathy Anselmo
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Beverly Tellis
57W–37L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Janet McNutt
86W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Martha Williams
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Catherine Corbett
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Anne Means
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Warren
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Shipp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.