Teams

Woodlake Jolinski

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs TDC SteinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Carolyn Wieder vs Eliza Causey / Andrea Elliott3-6, 1-6
2023-06-15vs Westwood CaudillLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Lim Han vs Meghan Dexter / Samantha Wetzel2-6, 5-7
2023-06-14vs WOCC Mathe / KramerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Kathleen Laroche vs Melissa Mathe / Catherine Matawaran0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-13vs HCC Adams / VernonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Laroche / Jeanean Phelps vs Rebecca Adams / Lisa de Groot3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-06vs ACAC QuilezLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Wieder / Jeanean Phelps vs Carole Camden / Jodi Tandett3-6, 4-6
2023-06-05vs ACAC HarrisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Carolyn Wieder vs Susan Cheatham / Amy Dobler6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.85
Lim Han
published
2.60
Wanda Huggins
published
2.51
Jenny Jolinski
published
2.51
Alison Joyce
published 3
2.47
Katherine Patterson
published
2.22
Diane Renkin
published 2.5
Kathleen Laroche
published
Meaco Coffey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Jolinski + Lisa Giangregorio134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
2.86
Lim Han
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Barbara Patterson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ekaterina Singletary
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wanda Huggins
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jenny Jolinski
9W–21L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Alison Joyce
2W–28L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Katherine Patterson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%58%42%
2.47
2.5
Diane Renkin
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.22
Kathleen Laroche
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.