Teams

Sunrise - Raskin

2022 Broward Adult 55 & Over - Day · 9.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-18vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerLost 02
L#1 DoublesEllen Raskin / Marci Feder vs Sheri Adler / Lou Armstrong4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Allen / Deborah Rhodes vs Cheryl Hicks / Andrea Cornelissen2-6, 0-6
2022-03-11vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Rhodes / Theresa Crosno vs Lori Paglini / Tracy Viebrock6-1, 6-1
2022-03-04vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Raskin / Theresa Crosno vs Barbara Cabral / Andrea Cornelissen5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-02-25vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeborah Rhodes / Theresa Crosno vs Sheri Adler / Lou Armstrong4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEllen Raskin / Kim Allen vs Cindy Leprevost / Jodi Appelbaum-Steinbauer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-11vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Raskin / Deborah Rhodes vs Tracy Viebrock / Andrea Cornelissen7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-01-21vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerLost 02
L#2 DoublesVeronica Wank / Deborah Rhodes vs Cheryl Hicks / Jodi Appelbaum-Steinbauer5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Raskin / Marci Feder vs Janine Burke / Barbara Cabral3-6, 3-6
2022-01-14vs Broward/Ltc - Hicks/AdlerLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeborah Rhodes / Theresa Crosno vs Barbara Cabral / Cheryl Hicks3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKrista Geoffrion / Christine Holcomb vs Andrea Cornelissen / Janine Burke3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Sharon Runk
published 4.5
4.13
Krista Geoffrion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Marci Feder
published
3.92
Ellen Raskin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.81
Veronica Wank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Deborah Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Runk + Veronica Wank7264% games+4.9% vs expected
Sharon Runk + Krista Geoffrion1449% gamesnot enough data
Krista Geoffrion + Veronica Wank2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sharon Runk
136W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Krista Geoffrion
31W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
16%83%<1%
4.13
Marci Feder
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Ellen Raskin
40W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Veronica Wank
149W–154L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Deborah Rhodes
11W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.