Teams

SoCal/Tran/40&Over8.0XD

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

21 players · average NTRP 4.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.66
Dean Ho
published 5
4.54
Karen Char
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.46
Julie Orris
published
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.32
Tai Sisson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Meng-Chieh Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Eugene Tran
published
4.05
Miho Mori
published
3.98
Frank Tran
published
3.94
Yumiko Tokiwa
published 4
3.91
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Wendy Dong
published
3.76
James Ha
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.57
Chunyan Chen
published 4
3.43
YONG LEE
published
3.36
Thai Nguyen
published
3.33
Jenniffer Wong
published 3.5
Jon Wang
published
Michael Gu
published
Quan Pham
published
Viola Xiao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Ha + Kristen Petrovacki5069% gamesnot enough data
James Ha + Chunyan Chen303 matchesnot enough data
Chunyan Chen + Jon Wang123 matchesnot enough data
Viola Xiao + Michael Gu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dean Ho
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.66
5
Karen Char
225W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.54
Julie Orris
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
4.46
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Tai Sisson
249W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Meng-Chieh Lee
135W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
4.21
Miho Mori
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
Frank Tran
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Yumiko Tokiwa
209W–92L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Kristen Petrovacki
133W–41L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Wendy Dong
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
James Ha
88W–53L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Chunyan Chen
17W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
YONG LEE
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Thai Nguyen
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Jon Wang
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Gu
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Quan Pham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Viola Xiao
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.