Teams

Miami/TeamForman/18&over4.5W

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 4.44 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Giuditta Castello
published
4.43
Magdalena Brave
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.40
BELEN DODERO
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.39
Laura Herskowitz
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.35
CAROLINA CAMPUZANO
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Ellen Malherbe
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.24
Leah Fish
published
4.15
Garvine Recalde
published
4.13
Adriana Umana
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Helena Maseda
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Jill Reiter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.06
Daniela Rengifo
published 4.5
4.04
Courtney Blatt
published 4.5
4.00
Jill Hidalgo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Kimberly Kaskel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.75
Allison Cohen
published 4
3.67
Katherine Kelly
published
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Malherbe + Laura Herskowitz17367% games+8.0% vs expected
Jill Hidalgo + Giuditta Castello11165% games+8.0% vs expected
Jill Reiter + Laura Herskowitz531362% games+3.7% vs expected
CAROLINA CAMPUZANO + Laura Herskowitz12363% games+1.8% vs expected
Helena Maseda + Laura Herskowitz4455% games+1.0% vs expected
Helena Maseda + Ellen Malherbe27862% games+0.9% vs expected
Magdalena Brave + BELEN DODERO341362% games+0.9% vs expected
Helena Maseda + CAROLINA CAMPUZANO6062% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Giuditta Castello
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Magdalena Brave
43W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
BELEN DODERO
47W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.40
4.5
Laura Herskowitz
170W–52L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
CAROLINA CAMPUZANO
133W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Ellen Malherbe
137W–54L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
Leah Fish
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Garvine Recalde
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Adriana Umana
41W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Helena Maseda
176W–66L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
Jill Reiter
102W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Daniela Rengifo
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
4.06
4.5
Courtney Blatt
77W–42L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
4.04
Jill Hidalgo
212W–131L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Kimberly Kaskel
26W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Allison Cohen
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Katherine Kelly
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.