Teams

Yadkin/Brost/FCC/18+5.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 5.5 - Wednesday Mornings

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs Yadkin/Orr/WW/18+5.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Clark / Laura Bray vs Emily Collins / Alisa O'grady6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLauren Kazakos / Ellery Day vs Carol Parker / Kate Gershner7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Mcquellon / Liz Harkey vs Karen Lehman / Colleen Goodwin6-1, 6-2
2026-08-19vs Yadkin/Orr/WW/18+5.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesVictoria Boysen / Laura Bray vs Joanna Hamilton / Amret Hawfield6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Clark / Ellery Day vs Margaret Wray / Rebecca Carmichael1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelly Mcquellon / Katie Cross vs Karen Lehman / Maureen Geraghty6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 - Wednesday Mornings have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Melanie Brost
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Deana Georgitis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Kelly Mcquellon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Lauren Kazakos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Victoria Boysen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Mary Bouchard
published
2.64
Meg Shipley
published
2.55
Liz Harkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Ellery Day
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Cross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Bray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Georgitis + Melanie Brost6656% games+7.2% vs expected
Victoria Boysen + Melanie Brost213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Brost
39W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Deana Georgitis
44W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Kelly Mcquellon
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lauren Kazakos
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Victoria Boysen
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Mary Bouchard
7W–1L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Meg Shipley
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Liz Harkey
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Ellery Day
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Katie Cross
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laura Bray
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.