Teams

Segrest/18/2.5/WD/BOC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-26vs Rae/18/2.5/WD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesReilee Kline / Chelsea Smith vs Emily Kinsley / Alex Marasco3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErica Johnson vs BERNADETTE ROBERSON6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine White / Jenny Ridge vs Rosie Ray / Hannah Shread4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Erica Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Reilee Kline
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Alexandra Mccall
published 2.5
2.48
Mandy Woodward
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.25
Diane Garbow
published 2.5
2.21
Marguerite Istre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.19
Mollie Carby
published
2.11
Chandel McDonald
published 2.5
2.04
Jenny Ridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Georgia Wilemon
published
1.95
Katherine White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathryn Clifton
published
Yolunda Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marguerite Istre + Erica Johnson3249% gamesnot enough data
Georgia Wilemon + Erica Johnson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erica Johnson
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%12%88%
2.66
Reilee Kline
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Alexandra Mccall
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Mandy Woodward
2W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Diane Garbow
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Marguerite Istre
11W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Mollie Carby
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Chandel McDonald
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jenny Ridge
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Georgia Wilemon
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Katherine White
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Kathryn Clifton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yolunda Taylor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.