Teams

Polk - Alley Cats/Tchipanova

2022 Polk Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-10vs Lakeland Country Club - S. NormanWon 10
W#1 SinglesNathaly Arredondo vs Brandy Lansford6-1, 6-1
2022-05-03vs Beerman - Grieger/EspitiaWon 10
W#1 SinglesNathaly Arredondo vs Laurie Grieger6-4, 6-3
2022-04-26vs Deuces Wild/Beerman - T. LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Nathaly Arredondo vs Tiffany Love / Leslie Simmons6-4, 6-3
2022-04-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Nathaly Arredondo vs Eva Mora / Jennifer Rogers7-6, 6-3
2022-04-05vs Deuces Wild/Beerman - T. LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Nathaly Arredondo vs Teresa Osborn / Wendy Delgado6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Angie Shoemaker
published 3.5
3.15
Allison Sorenson
published 3.5
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.10
Hayley Hurd
published 3.5
3.02
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
2.92
Karen Hogg
published 3
2.80
Jihyeon Choe
published
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
published
2.59
Tracey Ritter
published
2.54
Clara Copley
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Wyatt + Jihyeon Choe5451% games+5.9% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Nathaly Arredondo314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Desiree Tchipanova033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Shoemaker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 10 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Hayley Hurd
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Jihyeon Choe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Tracey Ritter
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Clara Copley
2W–15L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.