Teams

PHX/18Over/MarrancaChawla/5.0M

2023 SPRING Adult 18 & Over - CAZ · 5.0 Adult 18 & Over Men

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-24vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJose Hernandez / Josue Tovar vs Dustin Fisher / Robert Lanier1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmit Chawla vs Vijay Bapu6-1, 6-1
2023-06-17vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Rudy / PJ Marranca vs Chuck Tang / Kirk Williams4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeonardo Mendez / Josue Tovar vs Vijay Bapu / Derek Martin5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-10vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmit Chawla / PJ Marranca vs Dani Solomon / Robert Lanier6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesBrock Higley vs Kirk Williams1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJose Hernandez / Josue Tovar vs Vijay Bapu / Josh Bates6-3, 6-2
2023-05-27vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmit Chawla / PJ Marranca vs Derek Martin / Robert Lanier6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJosue Tovar vs Taylor Kim6-2, 6-3
2023-05-20vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmit Chawla / Jose Hernandez vs Oliver Intwari / Kirk Williams6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPJ Marranca / Joseph Rudy vs Christopher DeRosa / Taylor Kim6-2, 6-2
2023-05-13vs 5.0 OCO Kim M18SLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmit Chawla / PJ Marranca vs Dani Solomon / Christopher DeRosa7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJoseph Rudy vs Chuck Tang2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJose Hernandez / Leonardo Mendez vs Dustin Fisher / Derek Martin4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Adult 18 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/18Over/MarrancaChawla/5.0M3311715135
25.0 OCO Kim M18S3371124175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amit Chawla
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 5
4.38
Josue Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #2 Singles 31% · published
Brock Higley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Joseph Rudy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Leonardo Mendez
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
PJ Marranca
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PJ Marranca + Amit Chawla5351% gamesnot enough data
Josue Tovar + Leonardo Mendez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amit Chawla
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Josue Tovar
47W–9L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.38
Brock Higley
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Rudy
12W–2L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leonardo Mendez
19W–13L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
PJ Marranca
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.