Teams

Briley

Adult 18 & Over League · Adult 18 & Over 3.5W

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Flight standings3 teams · Adult 18 & Over 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Briley40164985
2Granath2213717154
3Allison0411938232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Hallye Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.15
Callie Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Archana Rao
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Rebecca Dean
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Kristi Briley
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.78
Rikki Sarabia Bosmans
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Kirby Felts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.71
Ginger Granath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Ashley Snook
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Briley + Hallye Phillips2353% gamesnot enough data
Hallye Phillips + Callie Bryan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hallye Phillips
43W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Callie Bryan
9W–24L career · 9 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Archana Rao
37W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
Rebecca Dean
42W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Kristi Briley
81W–70L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Rikki Sarabia Bosmans
8W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kirby Felts
4W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Ginger Granath
17W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Ashley Snook
1W–12L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.