Teams

CSRC ROSS

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 2.79 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-28vs GOG KREPSLost 04
L#1 DoublesDebra VanDeVeer / Cheri Ramsey vs Madeline Moviel / Erin Phillips4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTricia Hester vs Lily Beck0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRachel Ross / Brooke H Mitchell vs Sandy Straub / Cara Thoman2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Klausmeier / Lisa Coyle vs Christy Walsh / Laura DeVries6-7, 0-6
2026-05-18vs CSCC PEPPERLost 14
L#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Debra VanDeVeer vs Jennifer Smith / Becky Cleveland3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke H Mitchell vs Ronda Holton0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Klausmeier / Rachel Ross vs Kathryn Seibert / Glenda Coto Meckbel3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAmy Wooten vs Hanna Andrus6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDenice Yates / Tricia Hester vs Carol Pepper / Kayla Walker6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-11vs AFA HAMMERLost 13
L#1 DoublesDenice Yates / Alicia Stier vs Alex Hammer / Brittany DeCaires0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke H Mitchell vs Sonia Jumaquio1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Debra VanDeVeer vs Amelia Prado / Hannah Hofreiter5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Wooten / Lisa Coyle vs Holly Lane / Melissa Biewenga3-6, 5-7
2026-05-04vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 14
W#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Debra VanDeVeer vs Chana Kolman / Kim Weston6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesBrooke H Mitchell vs Jenn Hull0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDenice Yates / Tricia Hester vs Ann Skarban / Susan Shaink2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCrystal Klausmeier vs Lisa Ostly2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Coyle / Amy Wooten vs Michelle Richart / Melissa Herforth3-6, 1-6
2026-04-27vs CCOC JAMISONLost 05
L#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Debra VanDeVeer vs Melissa Jamison / Emilie Rudolph6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Wooten vs C Sather1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenice Yates / Alicia Stier vs Crista Muchmore / Sara Connolly-Somich6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCrystal Klausmeier vs Laura Toepfer1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Coyle / Tricia Hester vs Erica Hoffman / Melissa Hocate1-6, 0-6
2026-04-20vs CCW SCOTTSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTricia Hester / Alicia Stier vs Pamela Gustafson / Sunette Kleynhans1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCheri Ramsey vs Marilyn McGee6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrooke H Mitchell / Rachel Ross vs Margaret Hill / Mary Tostanoski7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Coyle / Amy Wooten vs Millicent Geers / Jeanne Osborn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-13vs PBCP TURNERLost 04
L#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Amy Wooten vs Ana Bhagat / Jami Cipriani4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTricia Hester vs Melanie Turner1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Stier / Denice Yates vs Holly Waller / Nora Day3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Ross / Lisa Coyle vs Andrea DeAngelo / Brigitte Juarez4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Cheri Ramsey
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.78
Debra VanDeVeer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Tricia Hester
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Alicia Stier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Rachel Ross
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Denice Yates
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.38
Crystal Klausmeier
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Lisa Coyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Brooke H Mitchell
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.30
Amy Wooten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke H Mitchell + Tricia Hester1543% games+8.2% vs expected
Debra VanDeVeer + Cheri Ramsey6454% games+6.1% vs expected
Lisa Coyle + Crystal Klausmeier8950% games+2.0% vs expected
Lisa Coyle + Amy Wooten1430% games−3.0% vs expected
Denice Yates + Alicia Stier112344% games−3.7% vs expected
Rachel Ross + Crystal Klausmeier213 matchesnot enough data
Crystal Klausmeier + Brooke H Mitchell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheri Ramsey
60W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Debra VanDeVeer
49W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Tricia Hester
2W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Alicia Stier
25W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Rachel Ross
18W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Denice Yates
36W–51L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Crystal Klausmeier
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Lisa Coyle
28W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.33
2.5
Brooke H Mitchell
1W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Amy Wooten
16W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.