Teams

The Notorious Ninjas

2023 40&Over Women Spring · Summer

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-29vs Eastern/Martin/40&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesFrances Pinto / Amy Chrebet vs Therese Martin / Cynda Kliewe4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSimona Satruc vs Ariella Soffer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Bennett / Maria Quinones-Caputo vs Kelly Boyle / Amy Greenberg4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesPatty Humes / Michelle Donner vs Michele Bednarsh / Tami Sasala6-7, 3-5
2023-06-15vs Spring FlingWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Hinds / Irene Hall vs Patty Thompson / Maryann Manning6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSimona Satruc vs Melanie Neubelt6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDima Mousselli / Laureena McCormack vs Evie Moldaver / Krista Olsen-Dibsie6-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesKristen Striano / Kim Silberman vs Dawn Petillo / Lisa Hart1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-25vs Eastern/Martin/40&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesPatty Humes / Irene Hall vs Cynda Kliewe / Dani Crooker0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSimona Satruc vs Ariella Soffer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Striano / Karen Hinds vs Amy Greenberg / Maria LaGratta3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDima Mousselli / Jamie Stavola vs Erina Watts / Kelly Boyle1-6, 5-7
2023-05-11vs Spring FlingLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Chrebet / Lori Bennett vs Theresa Sauta / Maura Wilson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMandy Carri vs Michelle Prager3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJaime Shapiro / Jennifer Walsh vs Dawn Petillo / Patty Thompson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Stavola / Lanae Herman vs Jane Doe / Maryann Manning6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Sarah Chin
published
3.36
Carolyn Stanyek
published 3.5
3.35
Lori Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Laureena McCormack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Victoria Reznik
published 3.5
3.28
Irene Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Simona Satruc
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Amy Chrebet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Cathy Kruse
published 3.5
3.21
Donna Pflug
published
3.16
Kristen Striano
published 3.5
3.14
Karen Hinds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Mandy Carri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.02
Dima Mousselli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Patty Humes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Jaime Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Kim Silberman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Jamie Stavola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Michelle Donner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Frances Pinto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lanae Herman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Quinones-Caputo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Reznik + Laureena McCormack6366% games+16.4% vs expected
Kim Silberman + Kristen Striano8750% games+10.4% vs expected
Kristen Striano + Sarah Chin3261% games+6.9% vs expected
Jamie Stavola + Karen Hinds3451% games+6.7% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Lori Bennett151054% games+2.9% vs expected
Patty Humes + Jaime Shapiro6947% games+0.4% vs expected
Dima Mousselli + Carolyn Stanyek121648% games+0.3% vs expected
Carolyn Stanyek + Karen Hinds8754% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Chin
68W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.98
3.5
Carolyn Stanyek
111W–84L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Lori Bennett
90W–135L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Laureena McCormack
59W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Victoria Reznik
110W–110L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Irene Hall
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Simona Satruc
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Amy Chrebet
16W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Kruse
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Donna Pflug
48W–45L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kristen Striano
118W–126L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.16
Karen Hinds
30W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Mandy Carri
49W–62L career · 1 line in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Dima Mousselli
54W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Patty Humes
59W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Jaime Shapiro
73W–89L career · 1 line in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Kim Silberman
42W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Jamie Stavola
27W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Michelle Donner
61W–84L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Frances Pinto
32W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lanae Herman
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Maria Quinones-Caputo
17W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.