Teams

GSTL18/Phillips/Dunes

2025 Adult 18 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 3.0 Evening

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-25vs GSTL18/Baxley/StablesLost 23
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gore / Patty Gresko vs Ally Baxley / Laureta Gale2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Lazar vs Elizabeth Foxworth2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Prinzi / Maryann Gaddy vs Annie Williams / Kimberly Hall6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNatalia Guyton vs Lauren Buehler2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Brady / Susan Sparks vs Austyn Smith / Margaret McGill6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-04vs GSTL18/Baxley/StablesLost 05
L#1 DoublesSarah Prinzi / Sandra Valentine vs Elizabeth Foxworth / Beth Ann Moran4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAndrea Lazar vs Jennifer Thomas6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Brady / Nikki Godwin vs Tracy Heinemann / Lauren Dieter6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Yates vs Sally Houghton4-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesTimmeri Massey / Jennifer Phillips vs Austyn Smith / Margaret McGill1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-11vs GSTL18/Baxley/StablesLost 14
L#1 DoublesSarah Prinzi / Jennifer Phillips vs Tracy Heinemann / Kimberly Hall5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPamela Yates vs Jennifer Thomas3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Brady / Brooke David vs Annie Williams / Gillian Barry6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMaryann Gaddy vs Lauren Buehler6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Lazar / Jeri Himmelsbach vs Ally Baxley / Laureta Gale2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 3.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Sarah Prinzi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.15
Sandra Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Susan Brady
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.82
Andrea Lazar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Joan Spencer-Ruper
published
2.80
Pamela Yates
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.78
Kimberly Gore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Maryann Gaddy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Beth Mishoe
published 3
2.73
Brooke David
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Susan Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Patty Gresko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Ashley DiSabato
published 3
2.63
Donna Zeglin
published
2.62
Jeri Himmelsbach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Cheryl Young
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.40
Timmeri Massey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalia Guyton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Nikki Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeri Himmelsbach + Donna Zeglin3448% games−5.9% vs expected
Patty Gresko + Kimberly Gore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Prinzi
34W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Sandra Valentine
22W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Susan Brady
26W–24L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Andrea Lazar
9W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Joan Spencer-Ruper
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Pamela Yates
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Kimberly Gore
19W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Maryann Gaddy
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Beth Mishoe
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brooke David
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan Sparks
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Patty Gresko
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Ashley DiSabato
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Donna Zeglin
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jeri Himmelsbach
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cheryl Young
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Timmeri Massey
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Natalia Guyton
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Godwin
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.