Teams

LAGUNITAS CC CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-07vs BELVEDERE TC CM8.5ALost 03
L#1 DoublesHenry Jacobson / Patrick Higgins vs Bennett Gazor / Peter Christodoulo1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDevin Hedrick / Tim Reidy vs Thomas Chung / Ben Portnoy6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Mayes / Stephen Sutro vs Daniel Mathis / Eric Tiret4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-31vs FLYTE RC CM8.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesThomas Mayes / Scott Niehaus vs Richard Khoe / Olivier Jorda6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Heely / Mark Gamble vs Joe Gulash / Thomas Schmidt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Higgins / Clay Lansill vs Olivier Picault / Sina Shekou3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Robert Cahill
published
4.04
Cole van Brunt
published 4
3.99
William Dagley
published
3.98
Devin Hedrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Scott Niehaus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Tim Reidy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Patrick Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Jeffrey Heely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Bill Lamm
published 4
3.38
Johnny Boynton
published
3.34
Matthew Caldwell
published
3.19
Clay Lansill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Mark Gamble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Henry Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Sutro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Mayes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Cahill
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
4.24
4
Cole van Brunt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
William Dagley
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Devin Hedrick
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Scott Niehaus
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.97
Tim Reidy
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.89
Patrick Higgins
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jeffrey Heely
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Bill Lamm
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Johnny Boynton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Matthew Caldwell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Clay Lansill
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Mark Gamble
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.96
Henry Jacobson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Sutro
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Mayes
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.