Teams

Holliday Hitters

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bake

16 players · average NTRP 3.45 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-21vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoLost 12
L#1 DoublesAgnes DeJong / Linette Holliday vs Rebecca Badgett / Carol Maier6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRochelle Torgusen vs Linh Bui6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Weber / Marri Tillema vs Jeannie Munn / Diane Bashirtash0-6, 2-6
2023-05-07vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinette Holliday / Natalie Chene vs Crystal Neptune / Sandra Gamboa6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Cheyanne Antongiovanni vs Nahla Tamer / Krista Rodriguez6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-30vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLinette Holliday / Mary Wilkening vs Briana Starr / Jennifer Stewart5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRochelle Torgusen vs Brooke Fernandez6-1, 6-4
2023-04-23vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinette Holliday / Ashley Periera vs Lauren Eittreim / Edyta Grant1-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoLost 02
L#1 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Hyejung Oh5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRhonda Slegers / Susan Frakes vs Rosemarie Galindo / Carol Maier2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-02vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoLost 03
L#1 SinglesRhonda Slegers vs Linh Bui6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinette Holliday / Kristin Weber vs Rebecca Badgett / Edyta Grant3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRochelle Torgusen vs Ashley South4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-26vs LLW - Queens of the Court - BakoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarri Tillema / Cindy Seibly vs Lauren Eittreim / Jeannie Munn2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Rochelle Torgusen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.49
Natalie Chene
published
3.44
Marites Idica
published
3.41
Brooke Drake
published 4
3.39
Susan Frakes
published
3.34
Rhonda Slegers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Ashley Periera
published 3.5
3.23
Linette Holliday
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.13
Agnes DeJong
published 3.5
3.06
Leah Coughlin
published
3.04
Michelle Pisano
published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Cindy Seibly
published 3
2.76
Minda Owens
published 3
Misty Haverstock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+10.4% vs expected
Rhonda Slegers + Linette Holliday5350% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Slegers + Minda Owens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Natalie Chene
10W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Marites Idica
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Brooke Drake
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Susan Frakes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Rhonda Slegers
54W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Ashley Periera
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Leah Coughlin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Cindy Seibly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Misty Haverstock
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.