Teams

HRAC-Columbia

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Gordon / Revell Coy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-19vs EW-YTC-DeGrasseLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Sabina / Dan Sager vs David Elofson / Jeff Brantner1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Rysavy / Revell Coy vs David Barnett / Eric Anderson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJim Pritchard / Roman Gavino vs James Degrasse / Danny Mullins3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-10-19vs EW-PEAK-QuallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesCraig Sabina / David Gordon vs Tim Qualls / John Cattell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJim Pritchard / Revell Coy vs John Williams / Guy Schneider2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Rysavy / Dan Sager vs Mark Jackson / Nelson Gourley1-6, 1-6
2024-10-18vs Park Fit Club-ThunderballLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Rysavy / Craig Sabina vs Jorge Pinos / Richard Splichal0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Gordon / Revell Coy vs Chris Ryan / Craig Hart6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDan Sager / Jim Pritchard vs Kevin Kuhlmann / Don Ho1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PEAK-Qualls40120250
2EW-YTC-DeGrasse31841080
3Park Fit Club-Thunderball22661285
4HRAC-Columbia134816103
5CBRC-So Easy0401224144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Revell Coy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Peter Rysavy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Craig Sabina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dan Sager
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Roman Gavino
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jim Pritchard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Revell Coy + Peter Rysavy044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Revell Coy
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Peter Rysavy
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Craig Sabina
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dan Sager
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Roman Gavino
80W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jim Pritchard
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.