Teams

Voeffray

2026 18&Over Mixed Manhattan · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-02-03vs Taur/WuLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Jack Geiger vs Pedro Abdo Breviglieri / Maggie Zhang6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTejaswin Gumber / Jessie Sarkis vs Timothy Llanos / Mindy Luong4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Schilling / Isabella Laufer vs Christoph Gackstatter / Rupa Subramaniam0-6, 2-6
2026-01-22vs RosenbergWon 10
W#1 DoublesLucy Burnhams / Jack Geiger vs Francesco Zappoli / Lucy Dew6-3, 6-2
2026-01-04vs Taur/WuSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Prusakowski / Jessie Sarkis vs Jeremy Law / Laurie-Maude Chenard5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJack Geiger / Lucy Burnhams vs Christoph Gackstatter / Rosie Shen7-6, 6-2
2025-12-07vs BernsteinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLucy Burnhams / Ethan Stern vs Theresa Fisher / Thomas Jardine0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Jack Geiger vs Lisa Bernstein / Mark Higgins3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-11-16vs ShinLost 03
L#1 DoublesIsabella Laufer / Ethan Stern vs Jee Young Park / Jonathan Shin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Christian Mcintosh Clarke vs Jessica Park / Taehyo Kim6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTejaswin Gumber / Jessica Kende vs Seung Ah Choi / Gihong Kim1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-11-02vs Concrete Court JungleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLucy Burnhams / Ethan Stern vs Jennifer Ahn Misner / Vineet Champaneria7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Jack Geiger vs Sarina Shahmoon-Kleinman / RONALD MARTINEZ1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJessie Sarkis / John Prusakowski vs Julien Li / Felix Hui1-6, 1-6
2025-10-26vs RosenbergWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaige Voeffray / Christian Mcintosh Clarke vs Amanda Ansell / Shantanu Godbole5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessie Sarkis / John Prusakowski vs Chris Spargo / Katherine Whyte6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLucy Burnhams / Tejaswin Gumber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jack Geiger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Christian Mcintosh Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Isabella Laufer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Ethan Stern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Lucy Burnhams
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.08
Jessie Sarkis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Paige Voeffray
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jessica Kende
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Prusakowski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Schilling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tejaswin Gumber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Sarkis + John Prusakowski123 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Burnhams + Ethan Stern123 matchesnot enough data
Jack Geiger + Paige Voeffray213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jack Geiger
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Christian Mcintosh Clarke
2W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Isabella Laufer
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Ethan Stern
4W–6L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Lucy Burnhams
7W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Jessie Sarkis
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Paige Voeffray
23W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
Jessica Kende
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Prusakowski
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jordan Schilling
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tejaswin Gumber
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.