Teams

Party at the Net

2024 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-30vs The RacquettesLost 02
L#1 DoublesHanieh Pace / Alisa Ratzlaff vs Kelli Miller / Katherine Fuller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Liz Mobley vs Elizabeth Hoehn / Jennifer Grantham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-23vs Ball Too WellWon 21
L#1 DoublesHanieh Pace / Natalie Carns vs Jenna Howell / Kayla Krittenbrink0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMadi Gruenbacher vs Bailey Bright6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPolly Kranz / Liz Mobley vs Rachel Seat / Samantha Bates6-4, 6-4
2024-05-16vs You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaddie Cloud / Madi Gruenbacher vs Teresa Smith / Fabiola Hernandez3-6, 0-3
L#1 SinglesValerie Salem vs Abby Bernardini0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carns / Lesley Smith vs Alex McDougal / Cindy Morrison3-6, 5-7
2024-05-09vs TD Academy 2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Carns / Summer DeFehr vs Esperanza Martinez / Jesse Matthews6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAlisa Ratzlaff vs Brandi Russell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErin Burkett / Liz Mobley vs Holly Baca / Andrea Baker6-2, 6-4
2024-05-02vs The LOBstersLost 12
L#1 DoublesHanieh Pace / Alisa Ratzlaff vs Jenny Smith / Melissa Smith1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMadi Gruenbacher vs Sarah Schmidt3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesErin Burkett / Liz Mobley vs Amy Hogg / Enaas Hamed6-3, 6-3
2024-04-25vs Team BeastWon 21
W#1 DoublesHanieh Pace / Alisa Ratzlaff vs Nguyet Burke / Sheila Rolen-Pender6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSummer DeFehr vs Katie Shepherd1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Polly Kranz vs Ashley House / Laura Neal6-1, 6-0
2024-04-18vs 4-Love-5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlisa Ratzlaff / Hanieh Pace vs Jordan Antolik / Ashton Masterson3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMadi Gruenbacher vs Kathleen Weinand6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLesley Smith / Marissa Wray vs Cameron Cato / Lauren Lidia3-6, 4-6
2024-04-11vs Over ServedLost 12
L#1 DoublesLesley Smith / Natalie Carns vs Emily Shanbour / Shannon Purnell0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlisa Ratzlaff vs Melinda Beaver5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPolly Kranz / Maddie Cloud vs Kimberly Eppes / Cindy Watts6-4, 6-3
2024-04-04vs OKC: Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesHanieh Pace / Liz Mobley vs Ali Weaver / Rachael Weber5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMadi Gruenbacher vs Angela Walton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Wolfe / Erin Burkett vs Beth Dayton / Natalie Moose2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC: Net Assets81171023207
24-Love-57218920217
3Ball Too Well54131432235
4Party at the Net36121531234
5The LOBsters36111634241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Madi Gruenbacher
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.48
Alisa Ratzlaff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.39
Liz Mobley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.32
Hanieh Pace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley Wolfe
published 2.5
2.12
Valerie Salem
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.10
Lesley Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Erin Burkett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maddie Cloud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marissa Wray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Carns
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Polly Kranz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Summer DeFehr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hanieh Pace + Alisa Ratzlaff5847% games+4.3% vs expected
Polly Kranz + Summer DeFehr123 matchesnot enough data
Hanieh Pace + Liz Mobley123 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Salem + Liz Mobley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madi Gruenbacher
22W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Alisa Ratzlaff
34W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Liz Mobley
16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%78%22%
2.39
Hanieh Pace
18W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Ashley Wolfe
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Salem
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Lesley Smith
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Erin Burkett
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maddie Cloud
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marissa Wray
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Natalie Carns
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Polly Kranz
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Summer DeFehr
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.