Teams

Fowler/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-23vs Wilson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Akil / Monica Burt vs Colleen Wilson / Molly Smith6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMakenzie Perkins vs Francesca Bengert6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Gambrell / Liya Yakupova vs Libby Flynt / Susan Deloach6-3, 6-1
2024-11-02vs Ray/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbigail Cardwell / Paige Swanquist vs Melanie Fant / Kelsey Ray6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMonica Burt vs Catherine Althoff2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRuth Newberry / Spring Parsons vs BriAnn Gibson / Destiny Taylor6-1, 6-0
2024-10-29vs Gillespie/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesTara Fowler / Liya Yakupova vs Hayden Malone / Marjorie Porter5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaige Swanquist vs Olivia House1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMakenzie Perkins / Susan Gambrell vs Sally Lewis / Casey Gleysteen6-0, 6-1
2024-10-05vs Wilson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Akil / Monica Burt vs Libby Flynt / Francis Mcrae7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMakenzie Perkins vs Colleen Wilson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Patrone / Paige Swanquist vs Tanner Baker / Francesca Bengert6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ashley Akil
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.64
Paige Swanquist
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Monica Burt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.59
Makenzie Perkins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Abigail Cardwell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.54
Tara Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Spring Parsons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Liya Yakupova
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Susan Gambrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Newberry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Akil + Monica Burt10265% games+19.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Akil
29W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Paige Swanquist
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Monica Burt
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Makenzie Perkins
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Abigail Cardwell
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
Tara Fowler
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
Spring Parsons
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
Liya Yakupova
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%59%41%
2.47
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Susan Gambrell
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.41
Ruth Newberry
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.