Teams

Duval/Healey/TriLevel3.5/3.0/2.5W

2023 Duval Trilevel Women · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-09vs Marsh Landing - PeverleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Merriam / Linda Valinho vs Debbie Theiler / Judy Galorath6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-02vs San Jose - AndradeWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Woods / Linda Valinho vs Allison Wise / Nancy Hennessy6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauriel Akhlaghi / Natalie Gettemy vs Dixie McDaniel de Andrade / AnnCandler Strohmenger6-1, 6-2
2023-07-19vs Palencia - MoseleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Woods / Linda Valinho vs Molly Moseley / Ashley Hassan6-2, 6-0
2023-07-19vs Magnolia Point - CaballeroWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Valinho / Theresa Merriam vs Kim Barelare / Carol Rynne6-0, 6-2
2023-07-12vs Planet Swim - SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Woods / Linda Valinho vs Rebecca Smith / Lauren Devereaux6-1, 6-3
2023-06-21vs Durbin Crossing - AndersenWon 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Merriam / Linda Valinho vs Mary Helen Goodwin / Jody Glover6-3, 6-1
2023-06-14vs Timuquana - HollandWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatalie Gettemy / Deb Prouty vs Vanessa Holland / Lucretia Norman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Lisa Woods
published
3.19
Natalie Gettemy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Beven Livingston
published 3.5
3.18
Linda Valinho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Lyndsay Proly
published
Deb Prouty
published 3
2.74
2.35
Sylvia Patnaude
published
2.35
Mary Ann Healey
published
Jennifer McGarity
published
Terrie Schleiter
published
Theresa Merriam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Gettemy + Linda Valinho2453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Woods
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
Natalie Gettemy
48W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Beven Livingston
13W–18L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Linda Valinho
92W–73L career · 6 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Lyndsay Proly
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Deb Prouty
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Allison Carbonneau
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Sylvia Patnaude
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.35
Mary Ann Healey
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.35
Jennifer McGarity
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terrie Schleiter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Merriam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.