Teams

McMullen Halm

2024 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 M Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-23vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesKyle Robertshaw / Paul Solorzano vs Leonardo Keselman / Jose Dsa3-6, 3-6
2024-03-16vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Alan Chin / Roger Blair6-4, 7-6
2024-03-02vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Andrew DePasquale vs Peter Martino / Jack Morris4-6, 3-6
2024-02-03vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Roger Blair / Barry Michael4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-13vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over3.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Kevin Dooling / Alex Arau7-6, 6-4
2024-01-13vs RCSP FantauzzoWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Joseph Flaherty vs Roger Blair / Jean Pierre DiVito6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Johnny Fung
published
3.44
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.44
Joseph Flaherty
published
3.43
3.36
Michael Issa
published
3.31
Andrew DePasquale
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Brian Griffin
published 3.5
Chi Ming Yu
published 3.5
3.24
YOUNES HAMDI
published
3.02
Paul Solorzano
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Johnny Fung
26W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Brandon Halm
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Joseph Flaherty
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Michael Issa
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Brian Griffin
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Chi Ming Yu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
YOUNES HAMDI
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.