Teams

BC-Han

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.64 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-24vs NWW-AYTC-PurohitLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaxwell Cancilla / James Fisher vs Shannon Nelson / Kevin Hsieh6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Steven Wu1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLogan Knott / Christopher Trippel vs Vineeth Omkaram / Dennis Nguyen3-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs NWW-MI-WalshLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Fisher / Logan Knott vs Frederick Walsh / Kristofer Goddard3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Kyle Everly1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSam Varon / Hunter Egger vs Christopher Elliott / Christopher Rice6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-10vs NWW-WSC-MurakiWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Fisher / Maxwell Cancilla vs Spencer Watanabe / Justin Tran6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Emahd Khan6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSam Varon / Hunter Egger vs Conor O'Meara / Jayson Shieh6-2, 6-4
2025-05-09vs NWW-FC-RegalaLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Fisher / Logan Knott vs Alex Braksator / Charles Thompson4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Han vs Alan Regala2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Conley / Hague VanDillen vs Mark Ball / Yevgeniy Kolomiyets6-4, 6-4
2025-04-26vs BETC-BrownWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Fisher / Logan Knott vs Richard Deitz / Nicholas Bishop6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Adam Amsel6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Han / Hague VanDillen vs Baraka Brown / Chuong Tran3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-12vs TCSP-Sand Point Slugs-LimayeWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Han / Mike Kung vs Riley Peschon / Rajul Chikkalingaiah7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Lucas Kim6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTodd Conley / Hague VanDillen vs Nishaant Limaye / Brandon Wei6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-06vs AYTC-Fellow Yeeters-Calpagiu/HuangLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Fisher / David Deming vs Gagan Jain / Justin Song7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKyle Swain vs Elias Soto Sepulveda0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDjelli Berisha / Sam Varon vs Alexander Calpagiu / Donny Baugh6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs AYTC-Rinse n Repeat-TruongWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Fisher / Logan Knott vs Robert Pendley / Yuta Chen6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesZhia Chong vs Connor Cole6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Trippel / Hunter Egger vs Jeremiah Bayna / Michael Cheong4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NWW-MI-Walsh8020412148
2BC-Han44131125217
3AYTC-Fellow Yeeters-Calpagiu/Huang35101432223
4TCSP-Sand Point Slugs-Limaye35101432231
5AYTC-Rinse n Repeat-Truong0832144277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
James Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 5
Christopher Trippel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Todd Conley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Djelli Berisha
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.35
Kyle Swain
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.29
Steve Heroux
published
David Deming
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Sam Varon
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.06
David Han
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Hague VanDillen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Hunter Egger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jeff Casserd
published
Logan Knott
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Maxwell Cancilla
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Kung
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Zhia Chong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Varon + David Deming4160% gamesnot enough data
Logan Knott + James Fisher224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
James Fisher
21W–11L career · 12 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Christopher Trippel
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Todd Conley
46W–34L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.64
4.5
Djelli Berisha
117W–68L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
4.38
Kyle Swain
46W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Steve Heroux
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
David Deming
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Sam Varon
82W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
David Han
24W–16L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Hague VanDillen
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hunter Egger
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Casserd
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Logan Knott
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maxwell Cancilla
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Kung
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhia Chong
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.