Teams

TING.Sebring

2024 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-04vs TOC.DefuscoWon 30
W#1 SinglesCarlos Kim vs Ronnie Strong7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Philip Chang vs William Horton / Danny Davis6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDerek Meares / Steve Clark vs Mario Karcevski / Scott Daniel6-2, 6-3
2024-04-20vs MD.HighLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilip Chang / Steve Pigora vs Jason High / Christopher Frederick6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Clark / Derek Meares vs Lukas Jantac / Jeff Moncrief3-6, 2-6
2024-04-06vs VR.KochSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Philip Chang vs Robert Andersen / Bob Andersen6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMahesh Shakthy / Derek Meares vs Ralph Koch / Rohan de Silva1-6, 1-3
2024-03-30vs TOC.KumarLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilip Chang / Steve Pigora vs Digvijay Singh / Guru Mallesh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-16vs LOCH.WatersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Derek Meares vs Brian Heaphy / Darren White0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Clark / Carlos Kim vs Trevor Hoyles / Kenneth Waters3-6, 6-7
2024-03-10vs TOC.RaghavanLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Chang / Carlos Kim vs Mark Spining / Sameer Cheema3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Clark / Derek Meares vs Balaji Radhakrishnan / Karan Mehra3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJack Sebring / Steve Pigora vs Anoop Gudipudi / SRINIVASRAGHAVA SURENDRA1-6, 1-6
2024-03-02vs TOC.HorowitzLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarlos Kim vs Daniel Horowitz3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Steve Pigora
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Carlos Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Derek Meares
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Jeff Huxtable
published
2.77
Andrew Butler
published 3
Duane Donders
published
Jack Sebring
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carlos Kim
38W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Derek Meares
68W–146L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jeff Huxtable
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3
Andrew Butler
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Duane Donders
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jack Sebring
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.