Teams

VCC - Feld

2026 B'ham Winter Weekday - Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women Wednesday

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-23vs Pinetree - Tillman 2.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCarissa Hughey / Catherine Townes vs Abby Chadwell / Kaylee Gunn6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKathryn Duett vs Katherine Erickson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMackenzie Dyer / McKenna Jones vs Leigh Tillman / Kristi Griffin4-6, 6-7
2026-02-11vs West Homewood - RabrenWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarissa Hughey / Sara Gunnells vs Kate Hiden / Meredith Husnik2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Newell vs Carolyn Parker3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Feld / Rebekah Hunter vs Mary Katzman / Carrie Hawkins6-4, 6-0
2026-01-28vs VCC - WilsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSara Gunnells / Landon Nast vs Elizabeth Batte / Emily Erwood6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMaggie Klyce vs Amy Garber6-0, 6-0
2026-01-21vs BHRC - Porter/WhatleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMackenzie Dyer / Catherine Townes vs Serena Porter / Laurie Russell6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathryn Duett vs Mary Beth Eichelberger6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLandon Nast / Elizabeth Gray vs Anne-Marie Whatley / April Boswell3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-01-14vs HCC - CoxWon 21
W#1 DoublesMackenzie Dyer / McKenna Jones vs Molly Knox / Melissa Cox6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKatie Newell vs Ali Rutledge5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Feld / Rebekah Hunter vs Emily Bennett / Lindsey DeRieux3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-01-07vs West Homewood - RabrenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Stone / Katie Newell vs Mary Katzman / Kate Hiden6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Townes / Laura Feld vs Kate Smith / Kim Schaefer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women Wednesday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pinetree - Tillman 2.560162795
2VCC - Feld5112614117
3BHRC - Porter/Whatley339921161
4VCC - Wilson0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Mackenzie Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Katie Newell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Carissa Hughey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.57
Laura Feld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Kathryn Duett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Maggie Klyce
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
McKenna Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Rebekah Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Catherine Townes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Landon Nast
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Sara Gunnells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebekah Hunter + Laura Feld4254% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Klyce + Katie Newell404 matchesnot enough data
McKenna Jones + Mackenzie Dyer213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Feld + Catherine Townes033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mackenzie Dyer
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.67
Katie Newell
29W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.63
2.5
Carissa Hughey
7W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Laura Feld
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
Kathryn Duett
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Maggie Klyce
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
McKenna Jones
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
Rebekah Hunter
19W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Catherine Townes
9W–9L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Landon Nast
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Sara Gunnells
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Anna Stone
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.