Teams

Seminole Lake Timmins

2021 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 MXD Sunday

8 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-20vs ELW ChristisonWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Irene Nasworthy vs James Bettencourt / Kirsten Willis6-2, 6-2
2021-06-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Mark Nasworthy vs Amber Maggio / Rene Fernandez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-05-23vs Pinellas - Tarpon/KronkLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Burnett / Esthela Gonzalez vs Thinh Duong / Brandy Mickey3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Fernandez / Kimberly Northup vs Erik Breitenbach / Abby Kronk3-6, 3-6
2021-05-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesJames Grandfield / Kimberly Northup vs John Noeske / Suzanne Jones6-4, 7-5
2021-05-02vs Safety Harbor HueholtLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Irene Nasworthy vs Alex Blair / Lisa Hueholt4-6, 4-6
2021-04-25vs McMullen FramersLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Northup / Michael Fernandez vs Brian Hodapp / Trisha Shirkey2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEsthela Gonzalez / James Grandfield vs Lance Hill / Marcy Kaufman4-6, 6-7
2021-04-18vs ELW ChristisonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Burnett / Kimberly Northup vs Clark MacCullough / Precious Cabiling1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Irene Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Diana Zarreke
published 4
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.46
Kimberly Northup
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.29
Jonathan Thompson
published
3.26
Mark Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Gina Timmins
published 3.5
3.21
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Nasworthy + Irene Nasworthy171059% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Diana Zarreke
10W–18L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Kimberly Northup
66W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jonathan Thompson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Mark Nasworthy
114W–79L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Gina Timmins
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–148L career · 10 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.