Teams

Weaver 40+

2025 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.0 Women 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-27vs MacLeanWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmy Sweyer vs Heather Martin6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDonna Waller vs Jennifer McCall4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Alice Weiser6-4, 6-4
2025-02-25vs Drennan/MaloneWon 30
W#1 SinglesAmy Sweyer vs Carol Drennan6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Faye Serkin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHannah Bodemann vs Larissa Malone6-4, 6-2
2025-02-20vs McCainWon 21
W#1 SinglesAmy Gibbons vs Jennifer Bradstreet6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPhyllis Middleton vs Pamela Vest6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDonna Waller vs Sandra Cerra6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-02-18vs MacLeanWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Sweyer vs Alice Weiser6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesPhyllis Middleton vs Eleni Pappamihiel6-2, 6-4
2025-02-06vs RussellLost 01
L#2 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Alicia Rineer4-6, 4-6
2025-01-30vs McCainWon 20
W#1 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Jennifer Bradstreet6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesHannah Bodemann vs Sandra Cerra6-1, 6-1
2025-01-29vs Drennan/MaloneWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Gibbons vs Alison Arnold6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Schreiber vs Carol Drennan6-0, 6-2
2025-01-29vs RussellWon 20
W#2 SinglesPamela Dieffenbauch vs Kara Gansmann6-1, 7-6
W#3 SinglesHannah Bodemann vs Katie Ragan6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Amy Sweyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Hannah Bodemann
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.67
Amy Gibbons
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Donna Waller
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Jessica Schreiber
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Pamela Dieffenbauch
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Phyllis Middleton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Sweyer
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Hannah Bodemann
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Amy Gibbons
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Donna Waller
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Schreiber
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Clark-Bradley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Dieffenbauch
5W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis Middleton
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.