Teams

GGlish-CHTC

2025 Eno River Combo 65 & Over · 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-06vs SRochkind-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Fisher / Doug Kopec vs Rick Edmunds / Robert Long6-3, 6-3
2025-10-05vs SRochkind-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Kennedy / Doug Kopec vs Richard Jaskot / Peadar Noone4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDonald Emmett / Gary Glish vs Robert Long / Philip Levy6-2, 6-4
2025-09-22vs SRochkind-UNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Sansone / Charles Fisher vs Steven Rochkind / Stephen Winters6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlan Furan / Timothy Buckley vs David Hilsabeck / David Molpus6-2, 6-2
2025-09-15vs SRochkind-UNCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Fisher / Gary Glish vs Robert Miller / Stephen Winters6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Kennedy / Doug Kopec vs MICHAEL LANCASTER / Robert Long6-1, 6-2
2025-09-08vs SRochkind-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonald Emmett / Doug Kopec vs Robert Miller / Peadar Noone6-3, 6-4
2025-08-25vs SRochkind-UNCWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlan Furan / Gary Glish vs Philip Levy / David Hilsabeck6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoseph Kennedy / Doug Kopec vs Robert Long / Steven Rochkind6-0, 6-2
2025-08-18vs SRochkind-UNCLost 01
L#2 DoublesGary Glish / Joseph Kennedy vs Peadar Noone / Richard Jaskot2-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Gary Glish
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Doug Kopec
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Timothy Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Chris Sansone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alan Furan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Eric Vance
published 3
2.52
Charles Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.28
Donald Emmett
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Kopec + Gary Glish18662% games+5.8% vs expected
Timothy Buckley + Gary Glish303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gary Glish
141W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Doug Kopec
82W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
Timothy Buckley
32W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Chris Sansone
11W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Alan Furan
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Eric Vance
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Charles Fisher
5W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Donald Emmett
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.