Teams

TPC Sugarloaf (Paul Torregrosa)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Men - Regular Levels · 3.0 Men (Greg Denson)

16 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-11-19vs Peachtree Station (Bruce Hubbard)*Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEdward Davis / Jason Rash vs Thomas Rowland / Paul Shlossman6-3, 3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (Greg Denson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Chad Carpenter
published 3.5
3.05
Tod Nelson
published
3.05
Vikas Malhotra
published
Armando Perez
published 3
Ashwin Shah
published 3
Jaimini Dave
published 3
2.59
Shawn Holtzclaw
published
Dave Struck
published
Jason Rash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jose Cangiano
published
Josh Wien
published
Martin Bush
published
Navin Shah
published
Pat Barron
published
Paul Torregrosa
published
Roberto Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Armando Perez + Shawn Holtzclaw2345% gamesnot enough data
Tod Nelson + Jaimini Dave314 matchesnot enough data
Paul Torregrosa + Pat Barron033 matchesnot enough data
Armando Perez + Vikas Malhotra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chad Carpenter
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tod Nelson
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Vikas Malhotra
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Armando Perez
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Ashwin Shah
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jaimini Dave
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shawn Holtzclaw
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.59
Dave Struck
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Rash
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jose Cangiano
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Josh Wien
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martin Bush
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Navin Shah
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pat Barron
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paul Torregrosa
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roberto Gutierrez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.