Teams

Downing/40s/4.0/SC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day

24 players · average NTRP 3.69 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Michelle Biehler
usually #1 Doubles 85%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published
3.87
Cherie Pausina
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Dawn Ledet
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 4
3.65
Allyson Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Daysi Valencia
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Carolyn Chassee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Courtney Bourgeois
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.98
Barrie Hidalgo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jamie McWilliams
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Jane Kuebel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janel Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Seeger
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Oubre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Wells
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Slimming
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Mamie Baker
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Monique Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Pamela Layton
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Rhonda Eckholdt
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published
Stephanie Rolling
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Tracy Pourciau
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Vonda Downing
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Biehler + Stephanie Rolling4264% gamesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Stephanie Rolling4158% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Ledet + Daysi Valencia404 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Ledet + Allyson Sanderson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Biehler + Jane Kuebel224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Osborn + Tracy Pourciau224 matchesnot enough data
Daysi Valencia + Kelly Slimming404 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Pausina + Rhonda Eckholdt044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Biehler
36W–11L career · 20 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
4
Cherie Pausina
14W–18L career · 18 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Dawn Ledet
29W–12L career · 19 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Allyson Sanderson
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
3.5
Daysi Valencia
55W–12L career · 34 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Christine Vincent
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Chassee
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Courtney Bourgeois
5W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barrie Hidalgo
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jamie McWilliams
29W–17L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Kuebel
15W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janel Gray
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Seeger
9W–5L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Oubre
7W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Wells
4W–7L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Slimming
43W–34L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Osborn
23W–21L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mamie Baker
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monique Thornton
3W–7L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Layton
1W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Eckholdt
30W–23L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Rolling
23W–15L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Pourciau
44W–26L career · 38 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vonda Downing
5W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.